Share this topic on FacebookShare this topic on MySpaceShare this topic on Del.icio.usShare this topic on DiggShare this topic on Twitter

Author Topic: Bruce Webster - Federal Execution - 4/16/07  (Read 2471 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ScoopD (aka: Pam)

  • Administrator
  • Fanatic
  • *****
  • Posts: 6568
  • Karma: +2258/-24
  • My BS'ometer is fully charged so bring it on!
Bruce Webster - Federal Execution - 4/16/07
« on: March 14, 2007, 03:46:32 PM »
Webster and another man on the federal death row here, Orlando C. Hall of El Dorado, Ark., were among five men whom prosecutors said kidnapped Lisa Rene from her Arlington, Texas, home to get revenge on her two brothers for a botched $5,000 marijuana deal. Over two days, she was taken to Arkansas, gang-raped, bludgeoned with a shovel and buried alive.

Rene, a native of the Virgin Islands who was living with relatives at the time of the abduction, was dragged from the family's apartment as she pleaded with a 911 operator. "They're trying to break down my door! Hurry up!" she said, according to a tape of the call.

A muffled scream is heard seconds later, with a man saying, "Who you on the phone with?" before the line goes dead.

Rene's body was found in a shallow grave at a nature reserve in Pine Bluff on Oct. 2, 1994.

Webster was sentenced to death by U.S. District Court Judge Terry R. Means of the Northern District of Texas on Sept. 24, 1996, on a jury's recommendation.



If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace. -Thomas Paine

My reason for supporting capital punishment: My cousin 16 yr. old Amanda Greenwell was murdered in March of 2004 at the hands of serial killer Jeremy Bryan Jones.

Mr_Dio

  • Guest
Re: Bruce Webster - Federal Execution - 4/16/07
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2007, 12:32:29 PM »
I would need to check but I believe Webster had a date in May of 06 as well.I do recall the feds had 3 dates in May of 06 which were frozen pending the outcome of the Clarence Hill vs Fla and Michael Moralez vs Ca suits.Both of these suits deal with the Constuitutionality of LI and the Hill case was resolved in favor of the State resulting in his eventual execution.The Moralez fiasco still goes on with a total halt of execution in Ca until its resolution.It'll be very intresting to see if the judge who issued the 3 stays last May is willing to sleep thru this one with all the court imposed halts currently in place.
Posted on: March 19, 2007, 04:33:41 PM
Stay of Execution for Bruce Webster


We have confirmed with the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) that Bruce Webster's April 16th execution date has been stayed. There was a lot of confusion about this case, because the BOP's news page still has the announcement of the execution date posted, and the AP ran a story a few days ago indicating that the execution was still scheduled for that date. However, as this entry in NCADP's Abolish the Death Penalty Blog over the weekend discussed, there have been many reports, including from pen friends of Webster, that a stay was in place. Capital Defense Weekly posted a copy of the stay order on their blog today. The order, which grants Webster's motion for a preliminary injunction, is dated February 16, 2007. Apparently, the stay went under the radar, and the reports from the press and BOP led many (including Amnesty International) to believe that the April 16th date was still set. The BOP informed us this morning that no new date has been set for Bruce Webster, but that his execution has indeed been stayed. We will continue to provide updates on this case as we receive more information.

(source: Amnesty International USA Program to Abolish the Death Penalty)

Offline Jeff1857

  • Fanatic
  • ***
  • Posts: 9431
  • Karma: +11/-0
Re: Bruce Webster - Federal Execution - 4/16/07
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2010, 01:01:19 PM »
Webster was Denied a COA by the 5th Circuit in today's Orders/Opinions.

Opinion is here:

http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/09/09-11039-CV0.wpd.pdf

heidi salazar

  • Guest
Re: Bruce Webster - Federal Execution - 4/16/07
« Reply #3 on: July 18, 2010, 03:38:27 AM »
Mental retardation evidence may not save Arlington teen's killer from death chamber

 Bruce Carneil Webster helped kidnap, rape, torture and bury alive Arlington teen Lisa Rene.

A judge on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agrees that new evidence, including psychological examinations, appears to show that Webster is mentally retarded.

But although the U.S. Supreme Court banned the death penalty for the mentally retarded eight years ago, 5th Circuit Judge Jacques Wiener Jr. and his two colleagues agree that they can't stop Webster's execution. The panel says he exhausted his appeals to the point that it can't consider new evidence unless it is likely to prove he was innocent.

And since everyone agrees he's guilty, Webster still faces death.

"We today have no choice but to condone just such an unconstitutional punishment," Wiener wrote as part of the panel's April 28 ruling denying Webster's request for a hearing on the new evidence.

Experts say the case is headed for a constitutional showdown.

"It's an outrageous situation," said David Bruck, a death penalty expert at Washington and Lee University law school in Virginia. "Sometimes the law just doesn't fit the facts. This is one of those times."

Steven Wells, Webster's attorney, said he plans to ask the Supreme Court to untangle the mess.

"If we're allowed to bring this new evidence before a fair and impartial judge, they will find that Bruce Webster is mentally retarded," Wells said.

Deadly night

On Sept. 24, 1994, Webster and three other men from Pine Bluff, Ark., went to the Polo Run apartments in Arlington. They were hunting two drug dealers who had taken $5,000 but failed to deliver a load of marijuana.

The dealers weren't home. Their sister, Lisa, a high school honor student, was.

The men crashed through a glass patio door, put her in a car and drove her to Arkansas. They repeatedly raped her over the next two days in motel rooms, and then led her to a nearby park.

Webster and the others hit her on the head with a shovel until she lost consciousness. Webster then gagged her, dragged her into a grave they had dug, stripped her, doused her with gasoline and buried her alive.

One other man, Orlando Hall, also is on death row. Three others including a man not involved in the kidnapping but charged in her death also were convicted in the murder and sent to prison.

Evidence claiming Webster is mentally retarded was a major part of his 1996 criminal trial, and has been a part of his appeals.

At his trial, jurors heard defense experts and Webster's family say he is mentally retarded. Prosecutors acknowledged his low IQ, but argued that he was able to adapt to his lack of intellect and knew right from wrong. A fellow inmate testified he saw Webster appear to be reading law books and making notes from them while in prison.

After the jury found him guilty, jurors were asked whether they thought Webster was or could be mentally retarded. Four of the 12 answered "yes."

U.S. District Judge Terry Means ruled then that Webster was not mentally retarded and sentenced him to death. His attorneys appealed.

High court ruling

In 2002, the Supreme Court clarified laws on mental retardation and execution in Atkins vs. Virginia, ruling that executing the mentally retarded constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. Webster's attorneys cited that decision in their appeal, but the 5th Circuit soon upheld Webster's death sentence, relying on the same arguments and evidence used at trial.

In February 2009, Webster's attorneys received records from when Webster applied for Social Security benefits to treat a sinus condition and headaches.

Those records, from a year before the killing, show that three doctors who examined him had found him to be mentally retarded.

The Social Security forms show that Webster had answered questions in nearly illegible, childlike handwriting: "I sleeps look at cartoon," he scrawled in answer to a question asking how he spent most days. When asked what books he liked, he answered, "Playboy naked books."

The records also show that Webster had been in special education classes as a child, contrary to what government witnesses told jurors at his trial.

In a motion opposing Webster's request for a hearing on the new evidence, prosecutors noted that one of the Social Security doctors said Webster was a "somewhat mild retarded con man, but very streetwise."

They also argued that Webster had just as much motivation to lie about his retardation to get Social Security benefits as he did to get out of the death penalty.

Richard Roper, who prosecuted Webster in his original Fort Worth trial, said the new evidence is not conclusive.

"This was extensively litigated at trial," he said. "I don't agree that this new evidence clearly establishes mental retardation."

It doesn't matter. The 5th Circuit found that because Webster had no new information showing he was innocent of the killing, it interpreted the law to mean it could not grant the new hearing.

The "Kafkaesque" situation, as Wiener describes it, arises out of changes made to federal criminal law in 1996. After the Oklahoma City bombing and the first World Trade Center attack, Congress put strict limits on the number of times federal inmates can challenge their sentences.

To file more than one appeal, an inmate has to have new information "sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable fact finder would have found the [defendant] guilty of the offense," the law states.

In the 5th Circuit's ruling, Wiener wrote: "If the evidence that Webster attempts to introduce here were ever presented to a judge or jury for consideration on the merits, it is virtually guaranteed that he would be found to be mentally retarded."

Roper, who is now in private practice, acknowledged that if the Supreme Court does not choose to hear the case, "it could still be up to President Obama as to whether an execution should go forward."

Lisa's mother, Agnes Rene, who lives in the Virgin Islands, said Webster deserves no mercy.

"He's just wicked," she said. "He claimed he was mentally retarded because he knew what was coming for him. He hit my daughter with a shovel. He buried her alive. The courts better know what they are doing. He was guilty. He is guilty. And he knew what he was doing."

John Blume, a law professor and director of the Cornell Death Penalty Project, said the case is a test of the legal system's evenhandedness.

"Is it fair to say that, because we don't like what this guy did, it's OK to not follow the law that says you can't execute someone who is mentally retarded?"

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/071810dnmetwebster.1ef824c.html