Share this topic on FacebookShare this topic on MySpaceShare this topic on Del.icio.usShare this topic on DiggShare this topic on Twitter

Author Topic: Darryl Durr - Ohio - 04/20/10  (Read 12779 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JT

  • Fanatic
  • ***
  • Posts: 2774
  • Karma: +304/-4
  • اعتقد ان الفرنسي غي له والتي
Darryl Durr - Ohio - 04/20/10
« on: June 03, 2009, 07:17:18 AM »
COLUMBUS (AP) — The Ohio Supreme Court has set execution dates for two killers on death row, bringing to seven the number of executions scheduled this year.

The court on Wednesday set a Nov. 10 date for Darryl Durr of Elyria in Lorain County, who raped and strangled a 16-year-old girl in 1988.

The court set a Dec. 8 date for Kenneth Biros, who killed a 22-year-old woman near Warren in northeast Ohio in 1991 after he offered to drive her home from a bar.

Biros has argued recently that he can’t be executed while he remains a party in a federal lawsuit challenging Ohio’s lethal injection system.

Among the state’s seven scheduled executions is that of Daniel Wilson, who is expected to be put to death about 10 a.m. Wednesday in the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility.
JT's Ridiculous Quote of the Century:
"I'm disgusted with the State for even putting me in this position."
-- Reginald Blanton, Texas death row.  As of October 27, 2009, Reggie's position has been in a coffin.

Offline JT

  • Fanatic
  • ***
  • Posts: 2774
  • Karma: +304/-4
  • اعتقد ان الفرنسي غي له والتي
Re: Darryl Durr - Ohio - 11/10/09
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2009, 09:42:49 AM »
Here's the facts of Durr's case from his direct appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court:

On January 31, 1988, at approximately 10:50 p.m., Norma Jean O’Nan and her husband returned to their home in Elyria and discovered the front door unlocked, the lights and television on, and their sixteen-year-old daughter, Angel Vincent, missing.  Only twenty minutes earlier, Mrs. O’Nan had spoken with her daughter by telephone to learn that Angel’s girlfriend, Deborah Mullins, was at her home and that Deborah’s boyfriend, appellant Darryl Durr, was expected to arrive later in the evening.  That was the last chance Mrs. O’Nan would have to speak to her daughter alive.

Mrs. O’Nan testified that Angel was wearing a hot pink sweater, a light pink and white checkered blouse, hot pink pants, and white tennis shoes when she and her husband left Angel home alone on the evening of January 31, 1988.  After notifying the Elyria Police of Angel’s disappearance, Mrs. O’Nan searched her home to determine if any of Angel’s belongings were missing.   Although Angel’s pink pants were found, Mrs. O’Nan’s search revealed the following items missing: an old lavender blanket with a hole in the center, a pair of black acid-washed denim jeans, Angel’s pink and white checkered blouse, light blue eyeglasses that Angel wore only in her home, a jean jacket that Angel had borrowed from a friend, an Avon necklace with an “A” charm attached, a small chain bracelet, an Avon slip-on bracelet, an inexpensive rhinestone ring and a dog chain that hung from her mirror.  Mrs. O’Nan also discovered Angel’s handbag stuffed under her bed.
 
Three or four days later, Mrs. O’Nan confronted Deborah Mullins and the appellant regarding the disappearance of her daughter, and was told by the appellant that “you know how kids are, she probably ran away.”

On April 30, 1988, three boys noticed a foul odor coming from two orange traffic barrels while playing in Brookside Park.  The barrels and been placed open end to open end, and were underneath a railroad tie.  Upon separating the barrels, the boys discovered a severely decomposed female body that had been wrapped in a dirty old blanket.  A portion of a leg was visible through a large hole in the blanket.

A deputy coroner testified that the only clothing found on the victim was a pink sweater and a pair of white tennis shoes.  The pink sweater had been pushed up well above the victim’s breast area.  An initial external examination determined the body to be that of a young white female, who was in an advanced state of decomposition.  The body was heavily infested with maggots and the body’s eyes and ears had been lost.  There was also prominent evidence of animal activity about the inguinal and vulval regions of the body, and in and about the thighs.  According to the deputy coroner, the decomposition was consistent with three months exposure.

After examining the body, the deputy coroner concluded that the cause of death was homicidal violence.  Since the body was so badly decomposed, the deputy coroner could not determine whether ligature marks, scrapes or tears indicating strangulation were present.  There was no damage noted to the internal cartilaginous structures of the neck.  The deputy coroner declined, however, to rule out strangulation as a cause of death since damage to these structures is not always present in young strangulation victims due to the flexibility of these structures.  In addition, because the body was so severely infested with bacteria, testing for the presence of acid phosphates and spermatozoa was inconclusive.

In September, 1988, after appellant was arrested for two unrelated rapes, Deborah Mullins revealed her knowledge of Angel’s disappearance to the Cleveland Police Department.  As the result of her information, an ankle X-ray obtained from Elyria Memorial Hospital, and dental records, the body discovered in Brookside Park was determined to be that of Angel Vincent.

At trial, Deborah Mullins testified that on the evening Angel disappeared Deborah had asked the appellant to drive to the house of one of Angel’s friends to retrieve a package of cigarettes for Angel.  Appellant agreed and left.  Shortly thereafter, appellant returned to Deborah’s house and, instead of entering through the front door, began throwing stones at her upstairs bedroom window and blew his car horn for her to come out.  Deborah and her baby, who had been fathered by the appellant, left the house and entered the appellant’s car where the appellant brandished a knife toward both of them. 

As the appellant was driving, Deborah heard noises from the back seat and after turning around discovered Angel bound on the rear floorboard.

According to Deborah’s testimony, Angel was wearing black acid-washed denim jeans, a jean jacket, and tennis shoes when she was last seen in the back of appellant’s car.

When Deborah asked the appellant why Angel was bound in his car, the appellant responded that he intended to “waste” her because “she would tell.”  He never revealed just what Angel was going to tell.

After threatening the life of both Deborah and his baby, the appellant let Deborah out of his car.  He returned to her home three or four hours later.  Upon returning, appellant told Deborah that he had “wasted” Angel and that she should pack her things because they were leaving.

Appellant drove Deborah and their baby to his wife’s, Janice Durr’s, Cleveland apartment.  After dropping Deborah and the baby off, the appellant left with a duffle bag containing two shovels.

When appellant returned, he was wet and covered with snow.  Upon entering the room, appellant placed a ring and bracelet that belonged to Angel on a coffee table.  As he was falling asleep, appellant told Deborah that he had strangled Angel with a dog chain until she “pissed, pooped and shit and made a few gurgling sounds,” took her body to a park, wrapped it in a blanket, placed it between two construction cones, and left her by some railroad tracks.

Later that day or the next day, appellant burned a bag of clothing in the basement of Janice Durr’s apartment building and asked Deborah to model the black acid-washed jeans that Angel had worn on the evening of her abduction.

The appellant then drove Deborah, Janice Durr and his children to the west side of Cleveland where he burned another bag of items, and while driving from Cleveland toward Elyria, the appellant threw Angel’s jean jacket out the car window.

After arriving at Deborah’s home in Elyria, Deborah’s mother informed her that Mrs. O’Nan had come over and inquired about Deborah’s knowledge of Angels’s disappearance.  Deborah testified that appellant threatened her and their baby’s life and instructed her to tell Mrs. O’Nan that Angel had been talking about running away.  Deborah also testified that the appellant took her and their baby to Edgewater Park where the appellant threw Angel’s glasses over a cliff into the lake.  A month or so later, while driving past the Cleveland Zoo, appellant pointed to a location and said, “Over there.”  When Deborah questioned his statement, the appellant replied, “You know what I am talking about.”
 
State v. Durr, 568 N.E.2d 674, 676-8 (Ohio 1991).

JT's Ridiculous Quote of the Century:
"I'm disgusted with the State for even putting me in this position."
-- Reginald Blanton, Texas death row.  As of October 27, 2009, Reggie's position has been in a coffin.

Offline Michael

  • Fanatic
  • ***
  • Posts: 5381
  • Karma: +351/-0
  • Strange things happen.
Re: Darryl Durr - Ohio - 11/10/09
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2009, 02:43:53 PM »
I hope this is a serious date and at the end of 11/10/09 justice will be served for Angel Vincent.

Michael
I´m not sure if there´s a hell, but I believe in executed murderers.

Offline JeffB

  • Fanatic
  • ***
  • Posts: 3169
  • Karma: +1299/-9
  • Does this rag smell like chloroform to you?
Re: Darryl Durr - Ohio - 11/10/09
« Reply #3 on: June 04, 2009, 05:49:17 AM »
Me too Michael..  Just the callous way he described how Angel died is incredible.   :o
"SO SUCK IT YOU "BLUE COOLER" DOPE!"  -  Sylar24

Offline ScoopD (aka: Pam)

  • Administrator
  • Fanatic
  • *****
  • Posts: 6551
  • Karma: +2218/-24
  • My BS'ometer is fully charged so bring it on!
Re: Darryl Durr - Ohio - 11/10/09
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2009, 03:56:23 PM »
Darryl Durr's execution has been postponed until April 20, 2010 by the Governor


If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace. -Thomas Paine

My reason for supporting capital punishment: My cousin 16 yr. old Amanda Greenwell was murdered in March of 2004 at the hands of serial killer Jeremy Bryan Jones.

Offline vikkiw47

  • Fanatic
  • ***
  • Posts: 1562
  • Karma: +69/-10
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - vikkiw47
Re: Darryl Durr - Ohio - 11/10/09
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2009, 06:03:07 PM »
Pam is it safe to say that the GOV has canceled all executions for the this year?
Justice is not about bringing back the dead. It is not about revenge either. Justice is about enforcing consequences for one's own actions to endorse personal responsibility. We cannot expect anyone to take responsibility for their own actions if these consequences are not enforced in full.

Offline ScoopD (aka: Pam)

  • Administrator
  • Fanatic
  • *****
  • Posts: 6551
  • Karma: +2218/-24
  • My BS'ometer is fully charged so bring it on!
Re: Darryl Durr - Ohio - 11/10/09
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2009, 06:19:46 PM »
to my knowledge those are the only 2 postponed so far. But we still have Kenneth Biros, Marc Brown and Vernon Smith on the calendar.. I guess time will tell. It is my understanding that the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals halted Reynolds execution and effectively set the pace for the others to follow since it is an injection process hearing from Brooms problamatic execution attempt last month that they are waiting on so my best guess is those scheduled for this year will also be postponed if this Broom case isn't resolved quickly.


If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace. -Thomas Paine

My reason for supporting capital punishment: My cousin 16 yr. old Amanda Greenwell was murdered in March of 2004 at the hands of serial killer Jeremy Bryan Jones.

Offline Jacques

  • Fanatic
  • ***
  • Posts: 1695
  • Karma: +442/-44
Re: Darryl Durr - Ohio - 11/10/09
« Reply #7 on: October 06, 2009, 10:05:17 PM »
Hey Governor .......... YOU MUST BE FROM OHIO!

Cynically! I would beat the pig dead! He seems to forget what he has done to Angel Vincent!

Best

Jacques
"If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it yourself." Albert Einstein

Offline Michael

  • Fanatic
  • ***
  • Posts: 5381
  • Karma: +351/-0
  • Strange things happen.
Re: Darryl Durr - Ohio - 11/10/09
« Reply #8 on: October 06, 2009, 11:41:44 PM »
I´m happy that you´re back Pam, but these aren´t the news I want to rad from you...  ;)

Michael
I´m not sure if there´s a hell, but I believe in executed murderers.

Offline GEO

  • Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 91
  • Karma: +53/-0
Re: Darryl Durr - Ohio - 11/10/09
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2009, 02:59:39 PM »
Ohio: 1 lethal injection drug should end lawsuit
By ANDREW WELSH-HUGGINS (AP) – 43 minutes ago

COLUMBUS, Ohio — The state's decision to replace a three-drug lethal injection with a powerful dose of one anesthetic is raising the possibility of what may have seemed unthinkable not so long ago: a truce in the long-running legal challenges to death penalty injection across the country.

Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray put it bluntly: A one-drug method would "render moot" his state's current injection lawsuit, which raises some issues found in other states regarding the potential for pain and suffering.

The state on Friday announced its plans to put a one-drug method in place by Nov. 30, in time to carry out an execution on Dec. 8. Inmate Kenneth Biros' execution has been on hold since a botched execution of another inmate on Sept. 15 temporarily stopped capital punishment in Ohio.

At issue are the other two drugs used in Ohio and 35 other states — one drug that paralyzes inmates and another that stops their hearts. Inmates have long argued that the combination of the other two drugs could cause pain that would not be detected.

Ohio, injection experts and defense attorneys challenging injection say a single dose of an anesthetic, similar to how veterinarians put down pets, would eliminate the potential for pain.

Opponents of the three-drug system aren't ready to concede the end of lawsuits anytime soon. But they're applauding Ohio for taking a step that other states have considered but not undertaken.

"If tomorrow every death penalty state got rid of the second two drugs in their protocols, certainly the Eighth Amendment concerns would be significantly alleviated," said Ty Alper, associate director of the Death Penalty Clinic at the Berkeley School of Law.

The Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishments.

Tennessee considered the one-drug approach but rejected it in favor of keeping the three-drug system. California also considered scaling back to one drug but concluded it might cause prisoners to go into convulsions "with unpredictable consequences."

Several states besides Ohio also have faced constitutional challenges to their three-drug execution procedures, but Ohio is the first to drop that approach in favor of a one-drug method.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of lethal injection last year, but Ohio's new system would be substantially different from the three-drug process the court examined.

The court also wasn't convinced by the one-drug approach.

The one-drug method, Chief Justice John Roberts said, "has problems of its own and has never been tried by a single state."

Ohio public defender Tim Young, whose office represents some inmates involved in the state lawsuit, supports the single anesthetic.

"There was a lot of pressure on a lot of the states for none of them to break ranks and move away from the three-drug cocktail they all used over the years, and it takes great leadership on the part of Ohio to move away from that," Young said.

But other important questions remain, he said, chief among them: how to deal with problems accessing an inmate's veins, an issue the one-drug system doesn't solve.

It was that issue that led Gov. Ted Strickland to stop the Sept. 15 execution of Rommel Broom, sentenced to die for raping and killing a 14-year-old girl in 1984.

Broom's execution is on hold while his lawyers fight the state's attempt to try a second time.

Ohio's response to Broom's problems was to create a backup that involves injecting the drug through muscles. But that's an untried system that could face its own challenges.

Also up for debate in Ohio and elsewhere: the training of the executioners and whether medical professionals should be involved.

Ohio provided no details on the backup or other aspects of the new procedure Friday.

"Ohio should be commended for trying to come up with something that will work and that they're breaking away from the other states that clearly have been using something that's been problematic," Deborah Denno, a Fordham University law professor and lethal-injection expert, said Saturday. "It's just that they have to provide more information."

Ohio has put 32 people to death since 1999, when executions resumed in the state.

Biros, 51, was sentenced to death for killing and dismembering a woman in 1991. He acknowledged he killed Tami Engstrom, 22, but said it was done during a drunken rage.

Copyright © 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Related articles
Ohio: 1 lethal injection drug should end lawsuit
The Associated Press - 35 minutes ago
Ohio to change lethal-injection procedure
Cincinnati.com - 18 hours ago
Ohio: 1 lethal injection drug should end lawsuit
The Associated Press - 2 hours ago
More coverage (28) »
 Add News to your Google Homepage
 
FILE- This undated photo released by the Ohio Department of Correction and Rehabilitation shows Romell Broom. Ohio on Friday, Nov. 13, 2009 became the first state to adopt a procedure for lethal injections that uses one drug, a method never before tried on U.S. inmates. (AP Photo/Ohio Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, File)
 

Map
George

Offline Posh

  • Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 194
  • Karma: +53/-20
  • "I value the DP because I value life." Eryn Baugh
Re: Darryl Durr - Ohio - 04/20/10
« Reply #10 on: December 10, 2009, 05:44:22 PM »
This child died a horrible death.  >:(
"Some have been thought brave because they were afraid to run away."
"Success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in life as by the obstacles which he has overcome."

Offline spotya

  • Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • Karma: +6/-0
  • horseman
    • MSN Messenger - jump_em@windowslive.com
Re: Darryl Durr - Ohio - 04/20/10
« Reply #11 on: January 14, 2010, 12:43:30 PM »
disgusting animal cant wait for this one!!!! >:(

Offline Jacques

  • Fanatic
  • ***
  • Posts: 1695
  • Karma: +442/-44
Re: Darryl Durr - Ohio - 04/20/10
« Reply #12 on: March 28, 2010, 11:24:02 AM »

In 1999, inmates could choose death on the then-new lethal-injection bed or in the electric chair inside the death house at the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility in Lucasville. Two years later, the electric chair was retired as an option and moved to a warehouse.

So Mister Strickland, again pls! It´s time for check out one of this scumbags from your hotel

Best

Jacques
"If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it yourself." Albert Einstein

Anne

  • Guest
Re: Darryl Durr - Ohio - 04/20/10
« Reply #13 on: March 28, 2010, 12:34:43 PM »
What a disgusting face >:(  >:( His crime is terrible and horrible  :o

It is time for the State of Ohio to applicate Justice...quickly :(  :(

You will pay bastard  >:(  :(  :D





Anne

Offline Moh

  • Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 488
  • Karma: +60/-15
Re: Darryl Durr - Ohio - 04/20/10
« Reply #14 on: March 29, 2010, 02:53:37 AM »
He actually bears quite a resemblance to Curtis Mayfield.