Share this topic on FacebookShare this topic on MySpaceShare this topic on Del.icio.usShare this topic on DiggShare this topic on Twitter

Author Topic: New Zealand Lawyer To Work on Charles Flores TX DR Inmate #999299 Final Appeal  (Read 1706 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jeff1857

  • Fanatic
  • ***
  • Posts: 9433
  • Karma: +11/-0
NZ lawyer backs death row inmate


A high-profile Auckland lawyer is leading the fight to save a Texas death-row inmate facing execution by lethal injection.

Lawyer Colin Amery intends to head to the United States later this year for the crucial final appeal of convicted murderer Charles Flores.

Flores, who has spent 9 years on death row, was found guilty of murdering a 64-year-old woman during a botched burglary and faces death by lethal injection.

Amery took an interest in the case after reading Flores' book, Warrior Within, and the pair have exchanged letters. He has sold dozens of copies of the book, with proceeds going towards Flores' appeal.

After reviewing the case, Amery is convinced of Flores' innocence and has been in contact with his New York lawyer and a Texas senator trying to help the 29-year-old clear his name. " I strongly believe in his innocence and will do whatever I can to help," Amery said.

"I feel this is an important fight. There are definite flaws in the case and a lot of corrupt practices have gone on."

Amery is probably best known for his private prosecution of Rainbow Warrior saboteurs Allan Marfart and Dominique Prieur.

Flores argues he was not properly represented at his original trial, with the prosecution case relying largely on flawed evidence and jailhouse snitches.

The chief witness against Flores had to undergo hypnosis to recall the events on the night of the murder.

Alibi witnesses, who could have proven Flores' whereabouts, weren't called at the trial, Amery said. Following his conviction, no mitigating evidence was produced to show why he should not receive a death sentence.

Amery says Flores has shown amazing courage as he battles to clear his name. "I just hope I can do something to help this chap. He may have been into drugs, but he is definitely not a murderer - he is a decent man."

(source: New Zealand Herald)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Good gosh!!! Don't these foreign scumyets have anything better to do? This scumyer reads a book and declares him innocent and and a decent man.

Let's see how decent he is ......Prior prison record:

#719836, 2 year sentence from Tarrant County for Robbery By Threats and Possession Of Cocaine

Summary of offense:

On 01/29/98, during the daytime hours, in Farmers Branch, Texas, the subject and the co-defendant, Richard Lynn Childs, murdered a 64-year old white female, during the course of a burglary. Flores and the co-defendant broke into the victim's house and shot the victim with a pistol. Flores and the co-defendant were looking for money but did not find any.

This freakin scumyer must be a scumpal as well.

Source: TDCJ

Offline Henrik - Sweden

  • Fanatic
  • ***
  • Posts: 624
  • Karma: +368/-2
  • Go pro? No!
Well... I guess we have to wait and see if there is any merits in this claims.

One thing I can say though Jeff. I have some knowledge in the field of psychology and I am quite interested in witness psyschology. Statements recalled by hypnosis must be taken with a large amount of scepticism, to say the least. The same goes for various kinds of therapy. There have been legal scandals in many countries where people have been condemned on statements from witnesses or claimed victims that later were proven to be totally false and the result of imagination.

Offline Granny B

  • Administrator
  • Fanatic
  • *****
  • Posts: 9034
  • Karma: +5608/-18
  • I'd like to help U out. Which way did U come in?
I'm not defending this POS's claims of bad acts by prosecution.  And I don't like the idea of a NZ scumyer coming here to prove there was misconduct in the case.

That being said, I also have some concerns about hypnosis in cases where this is used.  They make me somewhat suspicious.  Especially after the daycare sexual abuse of children scandals.  Suggestive questioning was used on children and presented as true evidence in court to convict and sentence innocent people.
" Closure? Closure is a misused word in the English language.  There is no such thing as closure for the family of a murder victim.  There will never be any closure for the death of our loved ones until we are dead ourselves.  The families have a lifetime sentence of anguish and sadness." 
Susan Levy

iamjumbo

  • Guest
NZ lawyer backs death row inmate


A high-profile Auckland lawyer is leading the fight to save a Texas death-row inmate facing execution by lethal injection.

Lawyer Colin Amery intends to head to the United States later this year for the crucial final appeal of convicted murderer Charles Flores.

Flores, who has spent 9 years on death row, was found guilty of murdering a 64-year-old woman during a botched burglary and faces death by lethal injection.

Amery took an interest in the case after reading Flores' book, Warrior Within, and the pair have exchanged letters. He has sold dozens of copies of the book, with proceeds going towards Flores' appeal.

After reviewing the case, Amery is convinced of Flores' innocence and has been in contact with his New York lawyer and a Texas senator trying to help the 29-year-old clear his name. " I strongly believe in his innocence and will do whatever I can to help," Amery said.

"I feel this is an important fight. There are definite flaws in the case and a lot of corrupt practices have gone on."

Amery is probably best known for his private prosecution of Rainbow Warrior saboteurs Allan Marfart and Dominique Prieur.

Flores argues he was not properly represented at his original trial, with the prosecution case relying largely on flawed evidence and jailhouse snitches.

The chief witness against Flores had to undergo hypnosis to recall the events on the night of the murder.

Alibi witnesses, who could have proven Flores' whereabouts, weren't called at the trial, Amery said. Following his conviction, no mitigating evidence was produced to show why he should not receive a death sentence.

Amery says Flores has shown amazing courage as he battles to clear his name. "I just hope I can do something to help this chap. He may have been into drugs, but he is definitely not a murderer - he is a decent man."

(source: New Zealand Herald)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Good gosh!!! Don't these foreign scumyets have anything better to do? This scumyer reads a book and declares him innocent and and a decent man.

Let's see how decent he is ......Prior prison record:

#719836, 2 year sentence from Tarrant County for Robbery By Threats and Possession Of Cocaine

Summary of offense:

On 01/29/98, during the daytime hours, in Farmers Branch, Texas, the subject and the co-defendant, Richard Lynn Childs, murdered a 64-year old white female, during the course of a burglary. Flores and the co-defendant broke into the victim's house and shot the victim with a pistol. Flores and the co-defendant were looking for money but did not find any.

This freakin scumyer must be a scumpal as well.

Source: TDCJ



the imbecile conclusively proves that he's an imbecile with such abject stupidity as:

. He may have been into drugs,  he is a decent man."


iamjumbo

  • Guest
Well... I guess we have to wait and see if there is any merits in this claims.

One thing I can say though Jeff. I have some knowledge in the field of psychology and I am quite interested in witness psyschology. Statements recalled by hypnosis must be taken with a large amount of scepticism, to say the least. The same goes for various kinds of therapy. There have been legal scandals in many countries where people have been condemned on statements from witnesses or claimed victims that later were proven to be totally false and the result of imagination.


that's pretty much true.  anyone under hypnosis is totally subject to the suggestions of the hypnotist

iamjumbo

  • Guest
I'm not defending this POS's claims of bad acts by prosecution.  And I don't like the idea of a NZ scumyer coming here to prove there was misconduct in the case.

That being said, I also have some concerns about hypnosis in cases where this is used.  They make me somewhat suspicious.  Especially after the daycare sexual abuse of children scandals.  Suggestive questioning was used on children and presented as true evidence in court to convict and sentence innocent people.


all too true.  mcmartin and kern county were more than adequate proof of that

Offline Wicket

  • Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 331
  • Karma: +411/-0
And this today from NZ's major Newspaper:

Horror at capital punishment in the United States led Nigel Benson to befriend a death row inmate

I first got to know Charlie Flores about a year ago. We have been writing regularly ever since. "Delayed conversations," he calls our letters. I've never met him and am unlikely to.

For Charlie is death row inmate #999299 in the Polunsky Unit in South Livingston, Texas.

I first learned about Charlie after he wrote a book, Warrior Within, about his life on death row.

For the past 11 years, he has lived in a 3m by 3m cell. There is a bed, a narrow window and a stainless steel toilet. He tells me he can see birds through the window.

Charlie, now 40, was convicted in 1999 of capital murder after an elderly woman was shot dead by two men during a burglary. It is a charge he vehemently denies.

"I look back at my experience that put me on Texas death row and one would think that such a saga would be confined to Made-for-Sunday-Night-Television-Movies. Unfortunately, it is not," he says.

"There are things in my my past that I regret and am ashamed of. I have been in jail before and I have used and sold drugs. And, when I learned that I was wanted for capital murder, I did the worst thing I could do - I ran. I knew that I would be sent to prison, or worse, forever and this scared me. So, I acted impulsively and I ran.

"This does not make me guilty of capital murder. This does not make me the shooter of the deceased. In the end, I'm a man who was accused of a crime and never had a fair chance at proving my innocence. I was convicted and sentenced to die because of my criminal background, because I'm a brown man [Mexican American] and because I do not come from an affluent family who could pay for an attorney to ensure my rights were protected at trial."

The facts show that coloured, indigent, unskilled people are the most likely victims of capital punishment. If you cannot afford good legal representation you're in big trouble.

"Ninety nine per cent of all death row prisoners are forced to accept government-appointed trial and appeal attorneys who are, all too often, incompetent and ineffective," he says.

"Capital punishment means [those] without the capital get the punishment.

"Effective legal representation is of crucial importance. If the defendant on trial does not have competent enough [counsel] to challenge the Government's evidence, the adversarial system of arriving at the truth crumbles and guilty verdicts are inevitable. When this happens, innocent or not, you will find yourself on a runaway train to the death house."

The death machine is also arbitrary. The longest time spent on death row was the 24 years Excell White endured before he was killed on March 30, 1999. The shortest time was the mere 252 days before Joe Gonzales was "put to death" on September 18, 1986. Madness reigns on death row.

Charlie rises at 5am most days and does an hour of meditation.

"That is my favourite time of the day, when all the lights are out in this building and there is no sound, everyone is asleep and the guards are lounging around somewhere, not slamming doors and carrying on."

The rest of his day is spent reading, dozing, listening to the radio and writing letters.

Most days there is an hour of recreation in an outside yard, followed by a shower. The inmates are recreated separately and never have physical contact with one another.

For the other 23 hours a day, every day, they are locked in their cells.

Death row is a world of constant noise. The clashing of metal on metal, amplified by the surrounding concrete. Inmates shouting in defiance at their concrete tomb.

The execution protocol is carefully designed to make the killing of a human being as clinical and detached as possible.

About two weeks before an execution, the prisoner is taken from the death row population and placed in a condemned cell in the death house at the Walls Unit in Huntsville.

It is here that they will watch the last days, hours and minutes of their lives tick by.

Executions are scheduled for 6pm local time. On the fateful day, no visitors are permitted after 12.30pm.

The prisoner is allowed a last meal of their choosing, up to a cost of US$35 ($52). About one prisoner in five declines the last meal. Others ask to have it donated to a homeless person. The meal is served between 3.30pm and 4pm. The inmate is then allowed to have a shower and put on fresh clothes, if desired.

Shortly before 6pm, witnesses to the execution are ushered into rooms beside the death chamber.

There are two separate rooms, allowing the victim's and condemned's families to be isolated from each other.

The condemned is escorted by guards into the death chamber to a gurney, on which they are secured by thick, leather straps with their arms outstretched in the shape of a cross.

Some panic-stricken prisoners have to be forcibly carried to the gurney.

Two intravenous catheters are inserted in veins in the prisoner's arms, legs or hands by a "medical technician".

When the lines have been attached, a saline solution flows. Lines containing the three chemicals which will end the prisoner's life lead from the gurney through a hole in the wall.

A technician waits behind a one-way window for the warden's command to activate the deadly apparatus.

Green curtains are then pulled back allowing the witnesses to view the final procedure.

A ceiling-mounted microphone is lowered down to the prostrate prisoner and they are invited to share their last words.

The procedure takes 15 to 20 minutes, while the poison takes about seven minutes to kill after it is administered.

The chemicals are introduced one at a time. Sodium thiopental to sedate the victim, pancuronium bromide to collapse the lungs and diaphragm, and potassium chloride which stops the heart.

The cost of the chemicals is US$86.08.

After the condemned is pronounced dead, the witnesses leave the two rooms and the body is immediately taken to a waiting vehicle and delivered to a funeral home for collection by relatives or the state.

The average stay on death row is 10 years. Charlie is living on borrowed time after 11 years on the row.

"This place will teach you how critical it is to have hope in your life when all is lost. If you have hope, if you have hope for a better tomorrow, for better things to come, then, when there is nothing else to live for, you have that. Unfortunately, I learned this lesson on Texas death row," he says.

"But, here's the thing about long suffering: it is our most persuasive teacher. The lessons we learn while suffering we never forget. So, in that regard, I give thanks for everything in my life. Even my suffering.

"I am convinced that I've been sent here to learn lessons that I would never have learned while free. All things happen for a reason; especially me being sent to this place. I think this was a way of life getting my attention and teaching me lessons I'd never have learned in the free world.

"I could not do this alone. I could not survive if I had no friends or family that cared about me."

For family and friends it is a living nightmare.

Charlie's elderly parents, Carter, 72, and Lily, 70, visit him as often as possible.

"My worst regret is being so selfish that I got caught up in this bullshit that sent me here for something I didn't do and left my parents out there alone," he says.

"They're getting old on me and it is tough to deal with that."

The US is the only Western democracy in the world which kills its own.

With China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, the US accounts for nearly 90 per cent of all known annual executions.

The practice was temporarily abandoned in 1972, after the US Supreme Court ruled the death penalty was "cruel and unusual" punishment.

However, the ruling had been circumvented within two years.

Today, Texas is the most enthusiastic death row state, killing 420 of the 1130 convicts who have been executed in the US since capital punishment resumed in 1977.

Charlie continues his fight against death, desperately working with lawyers to have to have his case re-heard.

Meanwhile, Dallas County prosecutor and death row advocate Rick Perry is up for re-election in November.

Opponents of the death penalty are hoping the election will usher in new change.

LETHAL LAWS
* Thirty-eight American states have the death penalty.

* Condemned prisoners can be hanged, put before a firing squad, injected with lethal chemicals, locked in a gas chamber or strapped to an electric chair.

* Lethal injection is also used by the United States Government and military.

* The states which have repealed capital punishment are Alaska, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin and the District of Columbia.

MY PEN PAL IS ON DEATH ROW

Journalist Nigel Benson first wrote to death row inmate Charles Flores last year. Since then there's been about two dozen letters, each one from Dunedin drawing an instant reply from Flores' prison cell in southeast Texas.

"He's almost trembling at the bit. He sort of lives vicariously through the correspondence."

Benson has told Flores about Dunedin, his work and his friends.

"I just tell him everything. In some ways it's been quite carthartic. I haven't written letters for years and in some ways it's what he needs."

Flores writes about his prison life and his appeals: "The reality for them all is they are trying to slow down the clock with appeals and stuff. The average time they stay is about 10 years."

Benson's understanding of Flores' guilt is tied up in the complexities of the Texas legal system. He says that Flores was with another man when a woman was shot dead.

"I made it clear I didn't care whether he was guilty. All I know is he was with a co-offender, they broke into an elderly woman's house, she and her dog got killed and Charles was convicted of capital murder after that."

Benson found Flores after becoming obsessed about the death penalty. He read all he could about the subject and found Flores' book, Warrior Within.

"I'm just revolted by the death penalty. There's something about the whole clinical way the process unfolds that disturbs me. No one knows who is pushing the button. Everyone involved just steps back and says 'I'm only doing my little bit'. And that's just part of the repugnance."

Veteran Auckland lawyer Colin Amery and wife Yvonne also write to Flores, as well other death row inmates.

Last month they had the unnerving experience of talking to Samuel Bustamante just two hours before he was executed. Bustamante, 40, the seventh prisoner put to death this year in Texas, was convicted of the 1998 murder of a hitchhiker.

Yvonne Amery said Bustamante thanked them for their support. The inmate, who died from lethal injection, said in his final call to imagine that when the Amerys walked beside the Manukau Harbour near their home the wind they felt "would be him and that he loved us".

For more information on Charles Flores, visit warriorwithin.weebly.com or charlesdonflores.com or he has a Facebook page at Charles Don Flores.


 :( This guy makes me ashamed to be Kiwi.

Offline Cema77

  • Resident
  • *
  • Posts: 125
  • Karma: +27/-0
I think I read somewhere that there are more white men on DR than any other race. I could be wrong on that.

Doesn't this lawyer have anything better to do? surely there are New Zealanders who require his liberal thug hugging services?

Gregg Fisher

  • Guest
I resent these idiots who act like they are adopting a pet. There are plenty of people who truly need help in the world.  Instead, they want the vicarious thrill of communicating with a murderer and the attention it brings them and they are willing to lie their a**es off on behalf of a murderer to achieve it.

Gregg Fisher

  • Guest
ANOTHER WIDDLE FLUFFY BUNNY TEXAS-CUTED!!!!1!!!!1!!

Elizabeth Black, the deceased, resided with her husband in Farmers
Branch[, Dallas County, Texas.  43 SR (SX 82). ]  At approximately 6:30 a.m.
on January 29, 1998, Mr. Black left for work.  He returned home three hours
later to discover Mrs. Black’s body beneath the den table.   Mr. Black
immediately called the police, who arrived at the scene within a few minutes.
An autopsy established that Mrs. Black had died as the result of a single
gunshot. [She was sixty-four years old.  43 SR (SX 82).] 

Nearby, officers discovered the Blacks’ Doberman pinscher, Santana,
shot through the back.  The size of the wound suggested a large-bore weapon,
such [as] a .44 caliber.  Fragments of potato littered the floor, table, walls, and
ceiling in the vicinity of the victim.  [The state introduced testimony that putting
the end of a gun barrel into a potato may muffle the sound of firing the gun and
act as a silencer.”  Flores, No. 73,463, slip op. at 8.]  On  the  floor near Mrs. Black’s body,
police officers found a .380 caliber bullet.  Officers located a shell casing of
the same caliber and a piece of potato on the floor inside the garage.  The spent
cartridge’s presence suggested that a semiautomatic pistol, rather than a
revolver, had fired the shot that killed Mrs. Black.  A police detective testified
that a second round struck the dog.  Although officers did not find another
bullet or shell casing, they did find a hole in the carpet, and  the size of the
wound and patterns of blood and potato spatter tended to corroborate this
hypothesis.

While searching the rest of the house, police discovered a hole in the
wall above the toilet in the hall bathroom.  In the master bathroom, someone
had punched a hole in the wall near the laundry hamper, opened the commode
top, and torn the sink and medicine cabinet from the wall.  Police found a large
potato inside the sink.  A ladder extending to the attic access-door stood in a
rear room.  There were no signs of forced entry or struggle.

Officers discovered $39,000 in cash hidden inside the master bedroom
closet.  Mr. Black stated that the Blacks’ incarcerated son, Gary, had left this
money with his parents before going to prison for selling drugs.  Gary’s
common-law wife, Jackie Roberts, had been receiving $500 of this money
from the Blacks each month.

Neighbors reported that a purple, pink, and yellow Volkswagen had
been parked in  the  Blacks’ driveway around 7:35 on the morning of the
murder.   The garage door was open a few feet, which was unusual.  The
Volkswagen driver got out, rolled underneath the garage door, and raised the
door to admit the Volkswagen’s passenger.  A neighbor identified [Flores],
dressed in dark-colored clothing, as the passenger, but other witnesses could
not identify the passenger.  After entering the garage, the two men shut the
door.  One neighbor heard a thud, but stopped investigating the matter upon
observing the multi-colored Volkswagen, which he had previously seen at the
home of Jackie Roberts.

Jackie Roberts (Jackie), who was on probation for possessing
methamphetamine, lived with her mother and three children on Emeline Street,
a short distance from the Blacks’ home.    She had become romantically
involved with Ricky Childs about three weeks before the murder.  Childs, a
drug dealer, habitually carried a .380 semiautomatic pistol in the back of his
waistband.

Childs, [Flores], and several acquaintances spent the early morning
hours of  the day of the murder inside [Flores’s] trailer using methamphetamine
and marijuana.  Childs and [Flores] left the trailer together in Child’s multi-
colored Volkswagen at approximately 3:00 a.m., arriving at Jackie’s home at
some time later that morning.  Jackie had arranged for an acquaintance, Terry
Plunk, to sell Childs and [Flores] a quarter-pound of methamphetamine.  She
had not expected [Flores], dressed in a long black duster, to accompany her
and Childs to purchase the methamphetamine, but [Flores] refused to hand
over his money without attending the drug transaction for fear of being “ripped
off.”  The trio rode in Jackie’s El Camino to an apartment near Love Field
Airport, where they met Plunk.  During the transaction, [Flores] weighed the
drugs on a portable digital scale and declared that the quantity delivered by
Plunk was a quarter-ounce short.  [The CCA notes, in a footnote, that
“Jackie testified that Plunk had not shortchanged them and that [Flores] was
trying to rip off Plunk.”  Flores v. State, No. 73, 463, slip op. at 4, n. 2. ]
Plunk made up the alleged shortage to avoid a confrontation.  Jackie, Childs,
and [Flores] then drove to [Flores’s] home with the drugs.  [Flores] weighed
the methamphetamine again and again accused Plunk of shortchanging him, 
insisting  that  the deal had been for a half-pound instead of a quarter-pound. 
[Flores] then pointed a gun at Jackie and asked what her “connection” would
pay for her head.  While Childs attempted to calm [Flores] down, Jackie
telephoned Plunk to see if he would cover the claimed shortage.  Plunk refused.
Childs, [Flores], and Jackie then drove to a nearby house, where Childs and
[Flores] acquired three firearms.  [Flores] was armed with a “long, blue gun”
and a handgun.  Childs carried a larger handgun.  When Jackie asked the men
why they had armed themselves, they told her that it was none of her business.

To make up the alleged  shortage, she agreed to pay [Flores] $3,900
from the cash that Gary Black had hidden at his parents’ home.  Childs
confirmed the existence of this money, and the two men dropped Jackie off at
home sometime between 6:35 and 7:15 a.m.  Childs’ former girlfriend,
Vanessa Stovall, testified that Childs and [Flores] arrived at Childs’
grandmother’s home on High Meadow around 6:30 that morning.  [Flores] and
Stovall smoked some methamphetamine before they left in the Volkswagen
between 6:45 and 7:00 a.m.

In her living room, Jackie spoke briefly with Doug Roberts (Doug),
who had arrived to take their son to school.  Later that morning, Jackie left to
visit Plunk.  A short time after Jackie’s departure, her mother told Doug about
the murder of Mrs. Black.  That evening, Doug went to the home of the
victim’s daughter, Sheila Black, and learned that neighbors had observed a
pink and purple Volkswagen outside the house.  Doug drove to Plunk’s house
to inform Jackie not only about the murder but also that neighbors had seen the
multi-colored Volkswagen at the scene.   He  tried to convince Jackie to go with
him to the police immediately, but Jackie feared possible retaliation or
prosecution.  Consequently, Doug drove her from Plunk’s house to a hotel.

On his way to the police station, Doug disposed of a map, discovered
by Plunk, that Jackie had drawn showing the area of her home and the Black’s
house.   He reported Childs’ possible involvement to the police that night and 11
submitted to another police interview the next day.  Law enforcement officers
apprehended Jackie at Doug’s apartment four days after the murder.  By then,
the police had arrested Childs.

[The CCA notes, in a footnote, that, “At trial, Jackie denied drawing this map for Childs and  [Flores],
stating that she drew it four days before the murder to guide her ex-husband’s girlfriend to the Blacks’ home
to babysit.  She initially told police that she drew it for Childs.”  Flores v. State, No. 73, 463, slip op. at 5,
n. 3.]

When he was arrested, Childs possessed amphetamine and a partial box
of the same brand of .380 ammunition found at the murder scene.  A police
search of his grandmother’s residence uncovered a .44 Magnum revolver and
shells, two boxes of .357 bullets, and  a pair of gloves.  Polarized-light
microscopy of granular material found inside the Magnum barrel identified
starch grains consistent with those from a potato.

A day after the offense, [Flores] admitted to a friend, Homer Garcia,
that he had shot the dog, but blamed Childs for killing the “old lady.”  [Flores]
made a similar statement to his father-in-law.

Two days after the murder, [Flores] and two others towed Childs’
Volkswagen to the parking lot behind the Grand Prairie roofing business
owned by [Flores’s] father.  There, between 6:00 and 7:00 p.m., [Flores]
sprayed the Volkswagen with black spray paint.  At some point, the license
plates were removed.  The group then towed the vehicle up an I-30 freeway
entrance ramp and onto the shoulder of the road.  [Flores] doused the
Volkswagen with gasoline and set the interior on fire.   When a passing
motorist stopped to offer assistance, [Flores] got into the tow car and drove
away.  Jonathan Wait, who was in the tow car with [Flores], testified that the
other motorist followed, but [Flores] eluded the other vehicle after an extended
high-speed chase during which [Flores] fired several shots at the other car.
On April 18, 1998,  at 7:00 p.m., Kyle police officers Slaughter and
Oaks stopped a blue Volvo traveling north on I-35.  [Flores], the vehicle’s sole
occupant, could not produce a driver’s license, but identified himself as Juan
Jojola, [Flores’s] brother, and presented a social security card bearing that
name.  Because of the alias, the officers did not discover that [Flores] had an
outstanding federal warrant for his arrest.  An angry motorist stopped at the
scene to complain that the Volvo had almost run his automobile off the road.

After [Flores] failed a series of field sobriety tests, Officer Slaughter
initiated an arrest for driving while intoxicated.  As the policeman started to
cuff the suspect’s hands behind his back, [Flores] turned quickly and struck
Officer Slaughter’s head with his elbow.   A struggle ensued, during which
[Flores] tried to push both police officers in front of oncoming traffic on the
freeway.  [Flores] called the arrest “bullshit” and insisted that it was not going
to happen.  Finally, Officer Slaughter managed to push  the group from the
roadway into a nearby ditch.  By chance, Deputy Mike Davenport of the Hays
County Sheriff’s Department arrived on the scene and assisted the police
officers in handcuffing [Flores].  The officers transported [Flores] to the Hays
County jail, where they charged him with driving while intoxicated and two
counts of assault on a peace officer.  Officer Slaughter suffered a swollen eye,
and Officer Oaks had a bite on her arm and an injury to a bone in her right
hand.  [Flores] was released from jail on bond before authorities learned his
true identity.

Following his arrest  for the instant offense, [Flores] was taken to
Parkland Hospital for treatment of a knee injury, accompanied by Officer
Bobby Sherman.  Because of the nature of [Flores’s] injury and because he
rode in a wheelchair, [Flores] was virtually unrestrained.   As Sherman and
[Flores] passed through an infirmary door, [Flores] reached around with both
hands and grabbed the grip of Sherman’s pistol.  Sherman grabbed [Flores] by
the neck, and they fell against the wall, then to the ground.  Sherman felt the
pistol coming out of its holster, but pushed the gun to the ground, forcing it
from [Flores’s] hands.  [Flores] struggled for it again, threatened to kill
Sherman, then bit him just above the elbow.  As Sherman yelled, “Grab the
gun,” he again forced the gun from [Flores’s] hand, and a doctor grabbed it.
Sherman  remained  on  top  of  [Flores]  trying  to  hold  him down, although
[Flores] continued to struggle violently.  Sherman then tried to spray [Flores]
with Mace, but [Flores] grabbed the can from him and began spraying it into
Sherman’s eyes and on hospital staff members.  Sherman continued to try to
restrain [Flores] with the help of two or three hospital staff members.  At some
point, someone grabbed Sherman’s handcuffs and handcuffed [Flores].

Before he took part in Mrs. Black’s murder, Flores committed   theft (for which he was
sentenced to six months’ probation and ordered to pay restitution), criminal mischief (for
which he was placed on two years’ probation), marijuana possession (for which he served
twelve days in jail), cocaine possession (for which he served three years in prison), robbery
by threat (for which he was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment), and parole violations.
39 SR 140-45, 150-52, 155, 156-73, 180-93, 204-20; 40 SR 12-20, 26-27, 30-56;  44 SR (SX
143-146).  While incarcerated before trial, he fought a fellow inmate, smuggled contraband,
and attacked law enforcement personnel.  40 SR 28-29, 89-104, 131; 41 SR 26-33, 34; 44 SR
(SX 146).




Gregg Fisher

  • Guest
DON'T IT MAKE MY DARK EYES BLUE BROWN

In state court, Flores challenged the trial court’s decision to allow the jury to hear
testimony from one witness—Jill Bargainer—who underwent hypnosis before identifying
Flores at trial.   

...  Bargainer [testified that she] witnessed two people drive up to the victim’s
home in a purple, pink and yellow Volkswagen on the morning of the murder.
Before hypnosis, she identified Childs in a lineup as the driver of the
Volkswagen and stated that the passenger had dark eyes.  She identified
[Flores] as the passenger for the first time at trial.

...  Bargainer explained to the trial court  that  she was unable to
remember any new evidence as a result of the hypnosis except to say that the
passenger’s dark eyes were brown.
No one had suggested to her a physical
description of [Flores], nor had she  seen  a  current photograph of [Flores.]
Although  she  had  seen  an  old  photograph  of  [Flores] in  one photographic
lineup, she was unable to identify him.  As a precautionary measure, the trial
court conducted a hearing
following the procedures set out in Zani v. State,
758 S.W.2d 233 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988),  and gave the jury instructions to
disregard any testimony arising from false memory, suggestion, or improper
influence.

As the trial judge remarked when it denied Flores’s objection after the 
hearing, the tint  of “dark eyes” versus “brown eyes” is hardly
evidence of a taint:


"[A]lthough it’s obvious that there was a hypnosis session, whether you could
call her ...  testimony hypnotically refreshed is a question.
I noticed no refreshment beyond perhaps the eye color, and I believe
she had previously stated that they were dark eyes, and it was compatible with
even that.

The real issue here is whether her in-Court identification is trustworthy
or not.  And if it is not trustworthy by reason of the hypnosis, then obviously
it would not be admissible.

There is ample corroboration of the fact  that [Flores] was the passenger
in the Volkswagen, all [of] which was just enumerated ...  The Court finds that
under the totality of the circumstances, that there is clear and convincing
evidence that the hypnosis undergone by Ms. Bargainer did not render her ...
in-Court eyewitness identification of [Flores] untrustworthy ..."



Gregg Fisher

  • Guest
Medical student, anesthesiologist restrain murder suspect trying to flee

DALLAS (AP) - It was a moment worthy of the hit TV drama "ER."

Four medical workers, including an anesthesiologist, subdued a murder suspect who was trying to escape during a trip to the hospital.

Charles Don Flores, charged with killing a 64-year-old woman during a burglary attempt in January, complained of a leg injury and was taken by Deputy Bryan Sherman to an orthopedic clinic at Parkland hospital Friday.

As the deputy was pushing Flores' wheelchair toward the clinic's entrance about 9:30 a.m., Flores jumped on him, officials said.

Flores forced the deputy to the ground, doused him with his own pepper spray and went for his gun, said Ed Spencer, a Sheriff's Department spokesman. In the struggle, the suspect bit the deputy's arm and twice had his hands on the gun.

Fourth-year University of Houston medical student Ferhan Asghar saw what was happening and leaped into the fray. He grabbed the gun and tossed it into a nearby laundry hamper.

At the same time, Dr. Andy Konen and technicians Peter Palafox and Charlie Hewgley jumped on Flores, subduing and handcuffing him, Spencer said.

Asghar's actions may have saved the deputy's life, Spencer added.

"We believe the suspect had planned this and was intent on fleeing and was attempting to shoot the deputy," he said. "So the indications are that Mr. Asghar was instrumental in helping to bring the situation to a conclusion. We are grateful and appreciative to him and all those who came to the officer's assistance."

Asghar and Konen could not be reached for comment, and Parkland officials said they had advised employees not to discuss the incident, pending the sheriff's investigation.

Deputy Sherman, 24, was fine after having his eyes flushed.
http://www.texnews.com/1998/texas/med0712.html



Gregg Fisher

  • Guest
Dirty juice box thrower!

Closing arguments in the sentencing phase of Charles Don Flores'capital murder trial were postponed Wednesday after he threatened and threw juice at a jailer during lunch.  DMN  04/01/1999



Gregg Fisher

  • Guest
The Blacks should have never kept this money for their son. It was obviously drug money and illegal. It ended up getting Mrs. Black killed.

Did these idiots really think they were not going to be noticed driving around in a pink, purple, and yellow volkswagon?????

Offline 14dp

  • Fanatic
  • ***
  • Posts: 690
  • Karma: +245/-12
I strongly believe in his innocence and will do whatever I can to help," Amery said.

That makes you a lousy lawyer.   A good lawyer doesn't care if the client is innocent or guilty as sin.   That's the job for the jury.  You are welcome.   

Also, if you were as smart as I am, you would know that this "I strongly believe" means just the opposite to what you tried to sell to the gullible.    The expanded and more honest version:  My client is a scum I wouldn't trust as far as I can spit but I have to say something that sounds good.   

Otherwise, you would have said:  I know beyond any doubt whatsoever that Flores didn't do what is claimed in the indictment.   

Amery, do you see the difference?   I do:  the suggested statement would put your reputation on the line.  On the other hand, your original line is a gem from the Clinton book of semantical tricks and offers what we call plausible deniability just in case Flores  fesses up.   

PS:  That "innocence" just doesn't work for me in this case.  The little angel I just said bye to when her mother picked her up an hour ago after a sleepover at the Grandma's is innocent.   Please find another term for your client.