Debra Jean Milke

[JTiscool]

I wonder if there is not a fascination for killers...

It is her choice but she must know this : NO FASCINATION FOR MURDERERS HERE ! NO COMPASSION FOR MURDERERS HERE !


 








Anne

That's right!

The correct place to garner sympathy and compassion for murders is at PTO or on some scumpal site. Please go there if you want to talk to people who care about them 

I do have no sympathy for murderers.

You're making up theories for Milke. Enough said.

[Gregg Fisher]

I do have no sympathy for murderers.

You *only* have sympathy for murderers. Especially those who murder children and babies.

[Maiken]

I do have no sympathy for murderers.

You *only* have sympathy for murderers. Especially those who murder children and babies.

FY

[Michigal]

Maiken, have you ever stopped to even consider the fact that she might be lying? Or consider the fact that she had told her sister she didn't want her son anymore and asked her to take him, not to mention the fact that the 2 guys who took her son in her car and killed him knew exactly how much the life insurance she had just taken out on Christopher was worth?

Of course that means nothing to you, she must be innocent because she said so....

Please stop making such a fool of yourself, you are giving me a headache.

[AnneTheBelgian]

I have a special treatment for child(s) murderer(s) and for the others killers... Give me your choice Maiken


Maiken, I think that Prison Talk is your place and not this website !!!






Anne

[Michigal]

I have a special treatment for child(s) murderer(s) and for the others killers...


Maiken, I think that your place is in Prison Talk and not here !!!






Anne

I agree, I see she has learned nothing from her close call with being banned. Can we ask for a recount?

[Gregg Fisher]

I do have no sympathy for murderers.

You *only* have sympathy for murderers. Especially those who murder children and babies.

FY

Truth hurts, does it?  You continually slobber over people who murder children and babies.

[JTiscool]

[Granny B]

I do have no sympathy for murderers.

You *only* have sympathy for murderers. Especially those who murder children and babies.

FY

[JTiscool]

I do have no sympathy for murderers.

You *only* have sympathy for murderers. Especially those who murder children and babies.

FY

Is that the best you got?

[Maiken]

Maiken, have you ever stopped to even consider the fact that she might be lying? Or consider the fact that she had told her sister she didn't want her son anymore and asked her to take him, not to mention the fact that the 2 guys who took her son in her car and killed him knew exactly how much the life insurance she had just taken out on Christopher was worth?

Of course that means nothing to you, she must be innocent because she said so....

Please stop making such a fool of yourself, you are giving me a headache.

Styers knew about that insurance and testified it in trail. See trail transcript of Styers trial.

Sure, it did occur to me, not only once, that it might be, that she was lying.

As I had said. If Ihad been on the jury during first trial and only listen to what detective Saldate said, I would have found her guilty.

But still I think, that to understand, one should alwas hear both sides.

What Gregg Fisher wrote, is simply so abominable, I do not know any other, than to give back to him, what he wrote some posts earlier. FY

What I think is, that though some cases need to be rethought, specially when they rely on such little or none real evidence.

[Gregg Fisher]

This is ridiculous.  If you ignore her, she will just keep posting all her defense lies and they will go unrefuted.  She'll never leave on her own. If you haven't noticed, she's not the most well adjusted person.   

[JTiscool]

But still I think, that to understand, one should alwas hear both sides.

12 hard working real folks heard both sides at trial/sentencing. They made the right decision and if we're wrong about her guilt we will apologize but until she is proven innocent beyond a reasonable doubt, as it stands she is guilty as my username being JTiscool. 

[Maiken]

But still I think, that to understand, one should alwas hear both sides.

12 hard working real folks heard both sides at trial/sentencing. They made the right decision and if we're wrong about her guilt we will apologize but until she is proven innocent beyond a reasonable doubt, as it stands she is guilty as my username being JTiscool.

You do not need to stress the point that the jury were hardworking people.

The way that case was presented to them, made them give to her the guilty verdict. Once a verdict has been made, it is very hard to overthrow it.
Because beforehand the attorney had to prove the guilt of the offender. Afterwards the offender has to prove his innocence.
Just imagine Milke being really innocent? How could she prove that?
How can anyone do that after being convicted ?
That is very very difficult.

[JTiscool]

But still I think, that to understand, one should alwas hear both sides.

12 hard working real folks heard both sides at trial/sentencing. They made the right decision and if we're wrong about her guilt we will apologize but until she is proven innocent beyond a reasonable doubt, as it stands she is guilty as my username being JTiscool.

You do not need to stress the point that the jury were hardworking people.

The way that case was presented to them, made them give to her the guilty verdict. Once a verdict has been made, it is very hard to overthrow it.
Because beforehand the attorney had to prove the guilt of the offender. Afterwards the offender has to prove his innocence.
Just imagine Milke being really innocent? How could she prove that?
How can anyone do that after being convicted ?
That is very very difficult.

Exactly. If she can't be proven innocent then she isn't. The prosecutor had his burden to prove Debra guilty, now Debra gets to carry the burden of proving herself innocent. It's fair to me.