no comment

[Russki]

Our morons are actually trying to keep this a secret.



This brand spanking new Airbus 340-600, the largest passenger airplane ever built, sits just outside its hangar in Toulouse, France without a single hour of airtime.

Enter the Arab flight crew of Abu Dhabi Aircraft Technologies (ADAT) to conduct pre-delivery tests on the ground, such as engine run-ups, prior to delivery to Etihad Airways in Abu Dhabi.

The ADAT crew taxied the A340-600 to the run-up area.

Then they took all four engines to takeoff power with a virtually empty aircraft. Not having read the run-up manuals, they had no clue just how light an empty A340-600 really is.

The takeoff warning horn was blaring away in the cockpit because they had All 4 engines at full power. The aircraft computers thought they were trying to take off, but it had not been configured properly. (flaps/slats, etc.)
Then one of the ADAT crew decided to pull the circuit breaker on the Ground Proximity Sensor to silence the alarm. This fools the aircraft into thinking it is in the air.. The computers automatically released all the brakes and set the aircraft rocketing forward.

The ADAT crew had no idea that this is a safety feature so that pilots can't land with the brakes on.

Not one member of the seven-man Arab crew was smart enough to throttle back the engines from their max power setting, so the

$200 million brand-new aircraft crashed into a blast barrier, totalling it.




The extent of injuries to the crew is unknown due to the news blackout in the major media in France and elsewhere. Because..........
Coverage of the story was deemed insulting to Muslim Arabs.




One French Airbus: $200 million dollars
Untrained Arab Flight Crew: $300,000 Annual Salary
Unread Operating Manual: $300

Aircraft meets retaining wall and the wall wins.

PRICELESS!

"And that's why their God gave them camels"!

I am still trying to discover who will be paying for this. The Dune coons or us French taxpayers.

[k"KKK"hirschkorn]

More proof  you cant fix  stupid.......

[Grinning Grim Reaper]

Perhaps a clear cut winner of the Darwin Awards! 

[Dball2002]

LMAO @ DUNE COONS 
Havent heard that term in a long time!
Thanks for the laugh frenchy!!!

[Kitten Resq]

"And that's why their God gave them camels"!

Just that line alone is priceless!!

[Texas_g2]

Ahhh yes !  A good day for the spare parts bin !! 

[PAPASTALKIN]

I bet the poor dune coons  are pissed that the french made such a poor plane and now you owe them money for hurting the highly advanced pilots.

[J - Dog]

plane says Eithad, was it meant to say "Jihad".  FAIL.  too funny.  thanks for sharing Frenchy.

[kanga]

Old news. happend 15 Nov 07.

Pilots probably trained in France!!

[kanga]

Violation of test procedures led to Toulouse A340-600 crash


By:   David Kaminski-Morrow London

01:16 10 Dec 2008 

Investigators have determined that an Airbus A340-600 collided with a test-pen wall in Toulouse after it was powered up while unchocked, and an attempt to steer the aircraft out of danger reduced the effect of the brakes.
 
The test crew failed to reduce the engine thrust as the jet surged forward, attempting instead to stop the aircraft by pressing the brake pedals and turning the nose-wheel sharply to the right. It smashed into the pen wall, seriously injuring four of the nine people on board.
 
A division of the French Bureau d'Enquetes et d'Analyses, which conducted the inquiry, has released its final report into the accident, stating that "lack of detection and correction" of test-procedure violations helped lead to the accident.
 
It points out that procedures for the test, aimed at checking for oil leaks, were not correctly followed, noting that the engines were all operating at high power and the aircraft was left unchocked.
 
Detailing the events leading to the collision, it says the aircraft arrived in the test-pen at 14:19 on 15 November last year and underwent routine engine tests for about 1hr 40min.
 
Just before 16:00 the power of the Rolls-Royce Trent 500 engines was increased to an engine pressure ratio of 1.25 - with the thrust levers corresponding to a position between maximum continuous thrust and maximum take-off thrust.
 
All four engines were operating. While the parking brake was on, registering 2,600psi, the inquiry says the applied thrust was around the limit of the parking-brake capacity.
 
At the time of the accident an Airbus employee was occupying the right-hand seat of the jet while an Abu Dhabi Aircraft Technologies technician was in the left-hand seat.
 
Flight-recorder data shows that, shortly after 16:02, the person in the left-hand seat warned that the aircraft was moving. The ground speed began gradually increasing to 4kt over the next few seconds and, after a second call that the aircraft was moving, the recorder registered pedal-braking and the deactivation of the parking brake.
 
Brakes on the A340-600 are linked to two hydraulic circuits: the 'green' normal circuit and the 'blue' alternate. The parking brake is on the blue circuit and only applies to the left- and right-hand main undercarriage bogies, not the centre bogie.
 
If the parking brake is released and the brake pedals applied, the 'green' circuit comes into play. The pedals act on all three main bogies.
 
Recorder data shows that 'green' circuit brake pressure on the A340 rapidly rose to 2,500psi while the 'blue' circuit pressure dropped.
 
About seven seconds after the first movement warning the nose-wheel was turned sharply right. Activating the nose-wheel steering inhibits braking on the central bogie, becoming completely ineffective past 20° of steering.
 
The aircraft swung 37° to the right but continued to accelerate, its speed increasing from 4kt to 31kt in seven seconds, before the aircraft struck the test-pen wall, demolishing its forward fuselage. The jet was written off.
 
In its report into the accident, the BEA says the aircraft and its braking system functioned correctly, but states that the nose-wheel steering "limited the effectiveness" of the brakes.
 
"Surprise led the ground-test technician to focus on the braking system, so he did not think about reducing the engines' thrust," it adds. Only after the collision with the wall were the throttle levers retarded to the idle position.

[Michael]

Even if it´s an old story it made my day....

BTW - Nice to read you kanga. 

[Jase]

Old news. happend 15 Nov 07.

Pilots probably trained in France!!

Guess you didn't get the bite you were after? Frenchie, Frencie, where for art thou frenchie???

[Russki]

"Investigators have determined that an Airbus A340-600 collided with a test-pen wall in Toulouse after it was powered up while unchocked, and an attempt to steer the aircraft out of danger reduced the effect of the brakes.
 
The test crew failed to reduce the engine thrust as the jet surged forward, attempting instead to stop the aircraft by pressing the brake pedals and turning the nose-wheel sharply to the right. It smashed into the pen wall, seriously injuring four of the nine people on board.
 
A division of the French Bureau d'Enquetes et d'Analyses, which conducted the inquiry, has released its final report into the accident, stating that "lack of detection and correction" of test-procedure violations helped lead to the accident.
 
It points out that procedures for the test, aimed at checking for oil leaks, were not correctly followed, noting that the engines were all operating at high power and the aircraft was left unchocked.
 
Detailing the events leading to the collision, it says the aircraft arrived in the test-pen at 14:19 on 15 November last year and underwent routine engine tests for about 1hr 40min.
 
Just before 16:00 the power of the Rolls-Royce Trent 500 engines was increased to an engine pressure ratio of 1.25 - with the thrust levers corresponding to a position between maximum continuous thrust and maximum take-off thrust.
 
All four engines were operating. While the parking brake was on, registering 2,600psi, the inquiry says the applied thrust was around the limit of the parking-brake capacity.
 
At the time of the accident an Airbus employee was occupying the right-hand seat of the jet while an Abu Dhabi Aircraft Technologies technician was in the left-hand seat.
 
Flight-recorder data shows that, shortly after 16:02, the person in the left-hand seat warned that the aircraft was moving. The ground speed began gradually increasing to 4kt over the next few seconds and, after a second call that the aircraft was moving, the recorder registered pedal-braking and the deactivation of the parking brake.
 
Brakes on the A340-600 are linked to two hydraulic circuits: the 'green' normal circuit and the 'blue' alternate. The parking brake is on the blue circuit and only applies to the left- and right-hand main undercarriage bogies, not the centre bogie.
 
If the parking brake is released and the brake pedals applied, the 'green' circuit comes into play. The pedals act on all three main bogies.
 
Recorder data shows that 'green' circuit brake pressure on the A340 rapidly rose to 2,500psi while the 'blue' circuit pressure dropped.
 
About seven seconds after the first movement warning the nose-wheel was turned sharply right. Activating the nose-wheel steering inhibits braking on the central bogie, becoming completely ineffective past 20° of steering.
 
The aircraft swung 37° to the right but continued to accelerate, its speed increasing from 4kt to 31kt in seven seconds, before the aircraft struck the test-pen wall, demolishing its forward fuselage. The jet was written off.
 
In its report into the accident, the BEA says the aircraft and its braking system functioned correctly, but states that the nose-wheel steering "limited the effectiveness" of the brakes.
 
"Surprise led the ground-test technician to focus on the braking system, so he did not think about reducing the engines' thrust," it adds. Only after the collision with the wall were the throttle levers retarded to the idle position."

I am still trying to find what is funny with this post. I am defeated.