Started by Elric of Melnibone, June 01, 2011, 08:39:37 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Woods murdered 3 people - 2 in Texas and 1 in CaliforniaAgain, the jury found that Woods was the shooter in the murders of Ron and Bethena. I can't make it any clearer for you. Both Woods and Rhodes are equally legally and morally guilty of the murderers no matter who pulled the trigger. However, under Texas law a jury is asked to determine whether the defendant is or is not the principal (shooter). If not the principal, it can be considered as mitigation. The jury found that Woods - not Rhodes was the shooter. Therefore, when Rhodes was set to go to trial, he was offered and accepted a plea deal based on the fact that he cooperated and was not the principal. He won't be eligibe for parole until he's in his 80s or 90s. The families of the victims were okay with this.
Petra? Petra, is that you???
You're an idiot. Maybe someone else can waste their time with you, dumbass, but I'm through.
FireEngineRed wrote: Tree hugging libs are using a case much like this to abolish the DP in California. They also use the method of evolution or morphing the dp into a de facto LWOP. California is a prime example how it's done: Just have one execution every 20 years. There is a method to this madness: instead of the death penalty, offer the guy LWOP under the condition he will not appeal and you can hire 10 government parasites - sorry, "workers" - for the money saved.