Part of his Last Statement moments before the Lethal Cocktail began to flow: "When I die, bury me deep, lay two speakers at my feet, put some headphones on my head and rock and roll me when I'm dead."
Douglas Roberts - Texas
Current Death Penalty Info - as of February, 2006
What are the latest developments concerning the death penalty?
On March 1, 2005, a closely divided U.S. Supreme Court reversed an earlier ruling and abolished the death penalty for juveniles. Relying on the "cruel and unusual punishment" provisions of the 8th Amendment, the Court cited the overwhelming weight of international opinion as a partial basis for the ruling. The number of Americans supporting the death penalty has begun to decrease, although well over 60% still support it.As China has become a more visible international power, its excessive use of the death penalty has come under increasing international scrutiny.
When did countries begin to abolish the death penalty?
Capital punishment was widely applied in ancient times throughout the world. The modern movement for the abolition of capital punishment began in the 18th century with the writings of Montesquieu and Voltaire. Some of the first countries to abolish capital punishment included Venezuela (1863), San Marino (1865), and Costa Rica (1877). Today, over half the countries in the world have abolished the death penalty either by law or through practice.(Click to see map) Since 2000, Chile, Yugoslavia, Serbia, Montenegro and Turkey have joined the list of abolitionist countries. Most executions occur in a handful of countries: China, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United States. In Great Britain, it was abolished (except for cases of treason) in 1971; France abolished it in 1981. Canada abolished it in 1976. In 1977, the United Nations General Assembly affirmed in a formal resolution that throughout the world, it is desirable to "progressively restrict the number of offenses for which the death penalty might be imposed, with a view to the desirability of abolishing this punishment".
What has been the recent history of capital punishment in the United States?
The U.S. Supreme Court in 1972 struck down state death penalty laws, a ruling that also brought federal executions to a halt. In 1976, the court reinstated the death penalty after the adoption of new procedures. From 1982 to 1999, 250 to 350 persons were annually sentenced to death but in the last three years the number of death sentences has dropped dramatically.(Click to see chart) The number of executions has gradually increased as appeals have become exhausted. In 1999, the number reached 100. In 2003, the latest year for which statistics are available, 65 were executed which represented less than 2% of those on death row. Among the 50 states, the death penalty is abolished in 13 states and 5 more states have not carried out any recent executions. Five states have carried out over 2/3 of the executions since 1977. There are also significant differences among the states in the way the death penalty is enforced as illustrated by the percentage of inmates on death row. In most states the method of execution is by lethal injection although in several states the prisoner may choose an alternative method. Nebraska stills mandates electrocution.
Why has the death penalty again become controversial in the United States?
Two relatively recent developments have focused renewed attention on the practice of the death penalty in the United States.
In January 2000, Governor George Ryan of Illinois imposed a moratorium on the imposition of the death penalty in Illinois. In reviewing death penalty cases since 1977, he determined that 13 death row inmates in the state had been cleared of murder charges, compared to 12 who had been put to death. Some of the 13 inmates were taken off death row after DNA evidence exonerated them; the cases of others collapsed after new trials were ordered by appellate courts. "There is a flaw in the system, without question, and it needs to be studied", Ryan said. Ironically, the Republican Governor had campaigned in support of the death penalty. Ultimately in January 2003, Governor Ryan commuted all death sentences to prison terms of life or less.
The execution of Timothy McVeigh in June 2001 also prompted renewed international interest in the U.S. practice of the death penalty primarily because of the high profile nature of the case.
Proponents of the death penalty argue that it deters criminals. Because so many variables are involved, this is a difficult contention to objectively evaluate. It is relatively safe to conclude that the overall serious crime rate is influenced by many other factors. Proponents also argue that the death penalty provides emotional compensation to the families of crime victims.
Most death penalty critics have an ethical basis for their opposition. They argue that a government's act to execute is a violation of human rights, especially if there remains a possibility that the individual is innocent. The development of DNA testing has exonerated a number of convicted criminals, include some on death row. They also charge that the penalty is particularly barbaric when applied to mentally retarded persons and juveniles.
Death penalty critics argue that the high reversal rate in death penalty cases illustrates the fallibility of the criminal justice process. A full 65% of convictions in capital cases are overturned according to one study. Yet there does not appear to be significant progress on many proposals for modifying criminal procedure in capital cases such assigning special judges and guaranteeing adequately trained counsel. Nor are there proposals which might impose a higher standard of proof in death cases for the purpose of reducing the risk of executing innocent persons.
Because of the intense scrutiny and numerous appeals applied to death penalty cases, a growing number of legal professionals have begun to oppose the death penalty for economic reasons, arguing that the costs of trial and appeals for a capital case are greater than would be the case if the death penalty were not sought. In addition, the average amount of time between the date of conviction and the date of execution is 10 years. Death penalty proponents maintain that life imprisonment without possibility of parole is still less expensive and there does not yet appear to be an academic study that has thoroughly evaluated this issue.
Finally, many death penalty opponents are concerned that the United States is out of step with other industrialized countries in its practice of the death penalty. The only other OECD country which permits the death penalty is Japan, and executions there are infrequent. On the other hand, Time magazine has reported that public opinion polls in Europe show significant support for the death penalty; in some countries it is even favored by a majority.
Does the death penalty apply to the mentally retarded?
In June 2002, the Supreme Court reversed a ruling it had made 13 years earlier and held in a 6-3decision that such punishment does constitute "cruel and unusual punishment" to this group. The court relied in part on the degree to which public opinion now characterized the punishment as excessive. A number of states had already passed legislation prohibiting such executions. As many as 10% of death row inmates suffer from mental retardation.
Are there racial differences in the application of the death penalty
As to perpetrators, any discrimination would be equivalent to the overall discrimination in the criminal justice system. Blacks no longer outnumber whites on death row and the rate of their death penalty sentences is roughly equivalent to their high percentage of the prison population.But as to victims, there is a discriminatory pattern. Studies have indicated that homicides involving white victims are far more likely to be prosecuted as death penalty cases.
Are minors subject to the death penalty?
On March 1, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court abolished the death penalty for minors. Prior to this ruling, minors were subject to the death penalty in a majority of states where the death penalty is practiced.
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.